 |
|
|
|
Topic: compare your tool vs SuperComm ActiveX from Adontec.com
|
| By: Dave | Posted on: Jun 30 2011 at 05:34:06 PM | | How does your activex component compare to the one from Adontec? What are the benefits of using yours over theirs? | |
| By: Support | Posted on: Jun 30 2011 at 08:07:44 PM | I've never used adontec's OCX so I can't talk about that.
Our simple SComm32.OCX ought to be a direct replacement for Microsoft's MSComm32 so if you know the Microsoft syntax or you're intending to replace MSComm in an existing project without having to change any of your code then ours should do that. Except it supports more ports than MSComm32, it's smaller and more reliable especially in modern versions of windows using non-standard com ports.
If you're not interested in MSComm32 compatibility then take a look at our other component Comm32.OCX which has additional features, properties and functions.
Why not take the trial download and see if it works for you.
On our downloads page at www.comm32.com you'll see the simple SComm32 at the top of the downloads page and a link to the larger Comm32.OCX at the bottom of the downloads page.
If you're working with .Net then instead of looking at an OCX I'd suggest looking at www.comm64.com which is a proper .net component for x86, x64 and AnyCPU projects.
| |
|
